The API Report CardAPI Index
Archer

Archer API

Enterprise GRC & Risk Management · archerirm.com

Archer exposes both SOAP web services and a REST API, documented at help.archerirm.cloud. Access is limited to licensed enterprise customers authenticating with instance credentials; there is no public developer program. Documentation is widely criticized as unclear.

Last verified: July 2026Software & Data Tools
API GRADE
D
VERIFIED JUL 2026

SCORECARD

ExistenceGOODDocumented SOAP and REST APIs at help.archerirm.cloud cover records, workflows, and data; the gate is licensing, not existence.
AccessPOORLicensed Archer enterprise customers only; the API is not available for third-party integrations.
CoveragePOORRecords and workflows are reachable, but fetching reports and specific data is a documented pain point.
AuthPOORAuthentication uses per-instance credentials for licensed customers; no public developer credential program.
Docs & DXPOORREST documentation is criticized as unclear; community forums fill with basic usage questions.
StabilityMIXEDField IDs change with each migration, breaking custom integrations; SOAP and REST surfaces coexist on a 25-year-old platform.
Supergood: Archer has an API, but using it means gates, contracts, or workarounds. Ours doesn't: stable endpoints, normalized JSON, managed auth.

Frequently asked questions

Archer scores D on the API Report Card. Archer exposes both SOAP web services and a REST API, documented at help.archerirm.cloud. Access is limited to licensed enterprise customers authenticating with instance credentials; there is no public developer program. Documentation is widely criticized as unclear.

Tried to integrate with Archer?
SOURCES
REST API documentation is not clear enough; difficult to understand how to fetch reports and specific data stackoverflow.com
API requires licensed access; not publicly available for third-party integrations help.archerirm.cloud
Custom coding not fully supported; field ID changes required with each migration g2.com
Community forums show frequent API usage questions indicating complexity archerirm.community
Archaic and visually unappealing UI; not intuitive or user-friendly gartner.com
Customization beyond out-of-the-box features is extremely difficult and expensive; requires dedicated Archer experts and consultants g2.com
Very expensive; prohibitive for small and medium businesses smartsuite.com
Limited reporting capabilities compared to competitors g2.com
Steep learning curve; requires significant time and resources to implement (avg 2 months) g2.com
Integrations can be difficult; browser compatibility issues (historically relied on Silverlight) g2.com