The API Report CardAPI Index
CloudApp

CloudApp API

Async video / screen recording / visual collaboration (now Zight) · getcloudapp.com

Zight (formerly CloudApp) states it offers no Open API; the legacy REST API on GitHub is archived and used HTTP Digest email plus password auth. Integration today means support-configured webhooks or the embeddable Record SDK, both routed through sales or support.

Last verified: October 2026Software & Data ToolsNO MCP
API GRADE
F
VERIFIED OCT 2026

SCORECARD

ExistenceFAILThe vendor states it offers no Open API; the legacy REST repo is archived and its developer portal is defunct.
AccessFAILProgrammatic access is gated through sales and partnership conversations; webhook setup is not self-serve on most plans.
CoveragePOORToday's surface is content lifecycle webhooks plus an embeddable Record SDK; the old items and uploads API is unmaintained.
AuthFAILLegacy API auth is HTTP Digest with email and password; there is no OAuth 2.0, blocking SSO and MFA-only orgs.
Docs & DXFAILDocs live in an archived GitHub repo; the original developer portal is gone, there are no server SDKs, and rate limits are unpublished.
StabilityMIXEDLegacy my.cl.ly/v3 endpoints still serve long-lived clients, but the API is archived with no public, versioned successor.
MCPNONENo official or community MCP server was found for CloudApp, now branded Zight. VERIFIED 2026-08
MORE FROM THE REPORT CARD
Supergood turns hard-to-integrate enterprise software into clean REST APIs and MCP tools: stable endpoints, normalized JSON, managed auth.

Frequently asked questions

CloudApp scores F on Supergood's API Report Card. Zight (formerly CloudApp) states it offers no Open API; the legacy REST API on GitHub is archived and used HTTP Digest email plus password auth. Integration today means support-configured webhooks or the embeddable Record SDK, both routed through sales or support.

Tried to integrate with CloudApp?
SOURCES
Public REST API repo on GitHub is archived and no longer maintained, long-lived clients still depend on it github.com ↗
Authentication is HTTP Digest with email+password rather than OAuth 2.0 or token-based, incompatible with SSO/MFA-only orgs github.com ↗
Original developer portal (developer.getcloudapp.com) has been deprecated; no public, versioned successor github.com ↗
Vendor explicitly states 'Zight does not currently offer an Open API', programmatic access is gated through sales / partnership conversations support.zight.com ↗
Webhook configuration is not self-serve in the standard UI for most plans, requires routing through support / sales support.zight.com ↗
Rate limits are not publicly documented github.com ↗
Record SDK depends on browser MediaRecorder + permissions; enterprise browsers / iframe sandboxes frequently block it zight.com ↗
No first-party server SDKs (Node/Python/Go/Ruby), implementors hand-roll Digest auth or use unmaintained community wrappers github.com ↗
No documented OAuth scopes / granular permission model, workspace-level access only support.zight.com ↗
Bulk export of a workspace's captures for compliance/backup requires support intervention; no documented 'export all' API support.zight.com ↗
Custom domain / vanity-link behavior is brittle and not exposed as a first-class API resource g2.com ↗
Roadmap velocity on the developer surface is slow relative to the consumer feature roadmap, partners report long lead times to ship new event types or fields zight.com ↗
Customer support is slow / hard to reach, users report multi-day waits for help and unresolved bugs left open for weeks g2.com ↗
Successive price increases without proportional new features over a 2-3 year span softwareadvice.com ↗
No native Android app, limits mobile use and is a common deal-breaker for distributed teams g2.com ↗
Custom-branded sharing domains and short links frequently get blocked by corporate URL filters / SafeBrowsing, breaking shares g2.com ↗
Full-page screenshots often capture only the visible viewport despite the 'whole page' option g2.com ↗
Limited customization on annotation and branding compared to Loom and Snagit joinsecret.com ↗
2023 rebrand from CloudApp to Zight caused brand and link confusion for long-term users and admin / SSO references en.wikipedia.org ↗
Free tier was tightened, limit of 25 captures and 90-second videos pushes users to paid quickly zight.com ↗
Team plan requires a 3-seat minimum, awkward for 1-2-person teams zight.com ↗
Reports of intermittent upload failures and Mac client crashes after OS updates capterra.com ↗
Storage / retention limits force purges or upsell on older Pro tiers zight.com ↗
Loom is widely cited as easier to use and more polished, putting Zight under constant competitive pressure screenrec.com ↗