The API Report CardAPI Index
Justia

Justia API

justia.com

No REST or GraphQL API. The only machine-readable surface is RSS and Atom feeds for opinion summaries and legal blog search. Directory leads, reviews, and case data have no programmatic path; anything else requires a bespoke commercial agreement.

Last verified: October 2026LegalNO MCP
API GRADE
F
VERIFIED OCT 2026

SCORECARD

ExistenceFAILNo REST or GraphQL API. RSS and Atom feeds for opinions and blog search are the only machine-readable surface.
AccessFAILNo API keys, sandbox, or partner program; programmatic use requires a bespoke commercial agreement.
CoveragePOORFeeds cover opinion summaries and blogs; directory leads, reviews, and dockets have no programmatic path.
AuthFAILNo auth surface exists: no OAuth flow, no key issuance, and no webhook signing.
Docs & DXFAILNo developer portal, OpenAPI spec, SDKs, or status page; leads arrive by email and dashboard only.
StabilityMIXED
MCPNONENo official or community MCP server was found for Justia in the MCP registry or on GitHub. VERIFIED 2026-08
Supergood turns hard-to-integrate enterprise software into clean REST APIs and MCP tools: stable endpoints, normalized JSON, managed auth.

Frequently asked questions

Justia scores F on Supergood's API Report Card. No REST or GraphQL API. The only machine-readable surface is RSS and Atom feeds for opinion summaries and legal blog search. Directory leads, reviews, and case data have no programmatic path; anything else requires a bespoke commercial agreement.

Tried to integrate with Justia?
SOURCES
No public REST or GraphQL API is offered for case law, statutes, dockets, attorney profiles, ratings, reviews, or directory events; partners cannot query Justia programmatically justia.com ↗
No developer portal, OpenAPI/Swagger spec, SDKs (JS, Python, Ruby, .NET), sandbox or API key issuance exists for Justia justia.com ↗
No webhook system for new directory leads (Ask A Lawyer, Justia Chat, profile contact form), new reviews, or profile changes, delivery is email and dashboard only lawyers.justia.com ↗
No native integration is published with any major U.S. legal practice-management platform (Clio, MyCase, Filevine, Litify, PracticePanther, CosmoLex, Smokeball, Rocket Matter) clio.com ↗
No native integration is published with major legal-intake CRMs (Lawmatics, CASEpeer, Captorra, Lead Docket) lawmatics.com ↗
No published Zapier, Make.com or Workato connector for Justia directory leads, Chat leads, or review events; firms must build email-parser middleware on notification emails zapier.com ↗
No OAuth, no API keys, no rate-limit documentation, no SLA and no published status page for any partner-facing developer surface justia.com ↗
No bulk export or programmatic data download for case law, statutes, dockets, or directory data; third parties routinely scrape Justia via Apify or Juriscraper apify.com ↗
No data-licensing or partner-data program for case-law corpus, attorney directory, ratings, reviews, or BlawgSearch index justia.com ↗
Free Law Project / CourtListener, Justia's primary free-law peer, does publish a documented public REST API, highlighting the integration gap courtlistener.com ↗
Justia Chat AI lead-capture widget does not document a developer SDK or webhook for delivering captured leads into a firm's CRM or practice-management system justia.com ↗
Gold/Platinum Placement purchase, profile updates, Elevate website changes and Amplify PPC management are sales-managed (phone (888) 587-8421), not self-serve API operations justia.com ↗
BBB complaint volume from attorneys reports inaccurate profile data, including showing attorneys as practicing at firms they left more than a decade ago bbb.org ↗
Slow technical-support response and inconsistent customer-service communication, especially for non-paying claimed-profile attorneys bbb.org ↗
Attorneys report that premium Gold and Platinum placements do not meaningfully outperform free profiles for the price, and that exclusivity is limited highervisibility.com ↗
'Lost in the shuffle', frequent complaint that free profiles are functionally invisible compared with paying competitors in the same practice area + metro onthemap.com ↗
Critics characterize Justia as a 'link farm' optimized to boost Justia client websites' rankings rather than deliver editorial value highervisibility.com ↗
Trustpilot reviews on law.justia.com skew low, with consumers confused about whether Justia is the court, the lawyer, or a third party trustpilot.com ↗
Gold and Platinum Placement pricing is quote-driven and not disclosed publicly, requiring an inside-sales call to (888) 587-8421 justia.com ↗
Attorneys complain about being auto-listed from public bar records without consent and having to manually claim profiles to correct or remove information bbb.org ↗
Justia Elevate website packages are perceived as generic templates with limited differentiation; firms feel websites blend together jurisdigital.com ↗
Premium Connect Pro membership at $19.99/month is criticized as marketing the same content as the free Connect tier with marginal incremental value connect.justia.com ↗
Practitioner reviews of Justia marketing services are mixed; multiple firms call out limited ROI versus alternatives like LawRank, Justia client churn rankings.io ↗
Plaintiff bar reports that Justia 'Ask A Lawyer' answers are dominated by SEO/marketing-driven lawyers giving low-substance answers as lead bait answers.justia.com ↗