The API Report CardAPI Index
Justia

Justia API

justia.com

No REST or GraphQL API. The only machine-readable surface is RSS and Atom feeds for opinion summaries and legal blog search. Directory leads, reviews, and case data have no programmatic path; anything else requires a bespoke commercial agreement.

Last verified: July 2026Legal
API GRADE
F
VERIFIED JUL 2026

SCORECARD

ExistenceFAILNo REST or GraphQL API. RSS and Atom feeds for opinions and blog search are the only machine-readable surface.
AccessFAILNo API keys, sandbox, or partner program; programmatic use requires a bespoke commercial agreement.
CoveragePOORFeeds cover opinion summaries and blogs; directory leads, reviews, and dockets have no programmatic path.
AuthFAILNo auth surface exists: no OAuth flow, no key issuance, and no webhook signing.
Docs & DXFAILNo developer portal, OpenAPI spec, SDKs, or status page; leads arrive by email and dashboard only.
StabilityMIXED
Supergood: Justia isn't going to ship an API, so we did: stable endpoints, normalized JSON, managed auth.

Frequently asked questions

Justia scores F on the API Report Card. No REST or GraphQL API. The only machine-readable surface is RSS and Atom feeds for opinion summaries and legal blog search. Directory leads, reviews, and case data have no programmatic path; anything else requires a bespoke commercial agreement.

Tried to integrate with Justia?
SOURCES
No public REST or GraphQL API is offered for case law, statutes, dockets, attorney profiles, ratings, reviews, or directory events; partners cannot query Justia programmatically justia.com β†—
No developer portal, OpenAPI/Swagger spec, SDKs (JS, Python, Ruby, .NET), sandbox or API key issuance exists for Justia justia.com β†—
No webhook system for new directory leads (Ask A Lawyer, Justia Chat, profile contact form), new reviews, or profile changes, delivery is email and dashboard only lawyers.justia.com β†—
No native integration is published with any major U.S. legal practice-management platform (Clio, MyCase, Filevine, Litify, PracticePanther, CosmoLex, Smokeball, Rocket Matter) clio.com β†—
No native integration is published with major legal-intake CRMs (Lawmatics, CASEpeer, Captorra, Lead Docket) lawmatics.com β†—
No published Zapier, Make.com or Workato connector for Justia directory leads, Chat leads, or review events; firms must build email-parser middleware on notification emails zapier.com β†—
No OAuth, no API keys, no rate-limit documentation, no SLA and no published status page for any partner-facing developer surface justia.com β†—
No bulk export or programmatic data download for case law, statutes, dockets, or directory data; third parties routinely scrape Justia via Apify or Juriscraper apify.com β†—
No data-licensing or partner-data program for case-law corpus, attorney directory, ratings, reviews, or BlawgSearch index justia.com β†—
Free Law Project / CourtListener, Justia's primary free-law peer, does publish a documented public REST API, highlighting the integration gap courtlistener.com β†—
Justia Chat AI lead-capture widget does not document a developer SDK or webhook for delivering captured leads into a firm's CRM or practice-management system justia.com β†—
Gold/Platinum Placement purchase, profile updates, Elevate website changes and Amplify PPC management are sales-managed (phone (888) 587-8421), not self-serve API operations justia.com β†—
BBB complaint volume from attorneys reports inaccurate profile data, including showing attorneys as practicing at firms they left more than a decade ago bbb.org β†—
Slow technical-support response and inconsistent customer-service communication, especially for non-paying claimed-profile attorneys bbb.org β†—
Attorneys report that premium Gold and Platinum placements do not meaningfully outperform free profiles for the price, and that exclusivity is limited highervisibility.com β†—
'Lost in the shuffle', frequent complaint that free profiles are functionally invisible compared with paying competitors in the same practice area + metro onthemap.com β†—
Critics characterize Justia as a 'link farm' optimized to boost Justia client websites' rankings rather than deliver editorial value highervisibility.com β†—
Trustpilot reviews on law.justia.com skew low, with consumers confused about whether Justia is the court, the lawyer, or a third party trustpilot.com β†—
Gold and Platinum Placement pricing is quote-driven and not disclosed publicly, requiring an inside-sales call to (888) 587-8421 justia.com β†—
Attorneys complain about being auto-listed from public bar records without consent and having to manually claim profiles to correct or remove information bbb.org β†—
Justia Elevate website packages are perceived as generic templates with limited differentiation; firms feel websites blend together jurisdigital.com β†—
Premium Connect Pro membership at $19.99/month is criticized as marketing the same content as the free Connect tier with marginal incremental value connect.justia.com β†—
Practitioner reviews of Justia marketing services are mixed; multiple firms call out limited ROI versus alternatives like LawRank, Justia client churn rankings.io β†—
Plaintiff bar reports that Justia 'Ask A Lawyer' answers are dominated by SEO/marketing-driven lawyers giving low-substance answers as lead bait answers.justia.com β†—