The API Report CardAPI Index
MockFlow

MockFlow API

Wireframing, UI mockups, and collaborative whiteboarding · mockflow.com

No public REST API, webhooks, or SDKs. The only programmatic surface is the 2025 MCP server family for AI clients, self-serve and even loginless but tightly rate-limited, at about 5 visualizations per 30 minutes anonymously. Server-to-server integration has no path.

Last verified: July 2026Software & Data Tools
API GRADE
C
VERIFIED JUL 2026

SCORECARD

ExistencePOORNo public REST API, webhooks, or SDKs; the only programmatic surface is the 2025 MCP server family and first-party plugins.
AccessMIXEDMCP access is self-serve, even loginless, but anonymous use allows about 5 visualizations per 30 minutes.
CoverageMIXEDIdeaBoard MCP exposes about 16 visualization tools, WireframePro just 3 plus read_wireframe; no path to projects or seats.
AuthMIXEDBrowser OAuth covers CLI and desktop MCP; SSO and SCIM 2.0 are Enterprise-only, and no general OAuth app program exists.
Docs & DXMIXEDMCP servers ship as NPM packages with docs and prebuilt AI skills, but there is no developer portal or OpenAPI spec.
StabilityMIXEDThe whole programmatic surface launched in 2025; paid plans allow about 30 tool calls per minute.
MORE FROM THE REPORT CARD
Supergood: MockFlow has an API, with gaps. We cover what it's missing: stable endpoints, normalized JSON, managed auth.

Frequently asked questions

MockFlow scores C on the API Report Card. No public REST API, webhooks, or SDKs. The only programmatic surface is the 2025 MCP server family for AI clients, self-serve and even loginless but tightly rate-limited, at about 5 visualizations per 30 minutes anonymously. Server-to-server integration has no path.

Tried to integrate with MockFlow?
SOURCES
No public REST API for MockFlow, cannot programmatically list projects, create wireframes, fetch comments, or manage seats outside the MCP surface mockflow.com
No webhooks, third-party systems must poll or rely on first-party Slack / Jira / Confluence notifications support.mockflow.com
MCP server family is shaped for AI clients (Claude, Cursor, VS Code Copilot, ChatGPT), not for traditional server-to-server backend integration mockflow.com
WireframePro MCP exposes only 3 tools (plus `read_wireframe`), limited surface for programmatic wireframe manipulation mockflow.com
Loginless Web MCP is rate-limited to ~5 visualizations per 30 minutes, not suitable for any production workload mockflow.com
Desktop MCP endpoints (localhost:21193 / 21194) require the user to have the MockFlow Desktop App installed and open, friction for headless or CI use mockflow.com
No OpenAPI / Swagger / GraphQL specification published for any MockFlow surface mockflow.com
No official SDKs beyond the two NPM MCP packages, no Python, Java, Go, Ruby, .NET client libraries npmjs.com
No general OAuth-app registration program, third-party developers cannot build a marketplace integration outside the existing first-party connectors support.mockflow.com
SCIM provisioning requires Enterprise or annual TeamPack license, not available on lower tiers support.mockflow.com
Wireframe-to-code Build Mode export is stub-quality and not a production code-generation surface mockflow.com
No documented rate-limit policy, status page, or developer changelog for the MCP servers beyond brief notes on the MCP marketing page mockflow.com
Brand collision with mockflow.io (mock-API generator) creates persistent confusion among developers searching for 'MockFlow API' mockflow.io
No published HIPAA BAA, FedRAMP, IRAP, C5, or explicit GDPR data-residency commitments on the security page mockflow.com
Performance is slow and bulkier pages take time to load, especially on larger multi-page projects g2.com
UI feels dated and less intuitive than Figma or Sketch; many keyboard shortcuts standard in Sketch/Figma/Photoshop are missing g2.com
Demonstrating hierarchical relationships between controls (dropdowns, nested components) is described as clunky capterra.com
Selecting multiple components or resizing multiple layers at once is difficult capterra.com
Free plan is heavily limited (1 wireframe project, 3 IdeaBoard projects, 100 AI credits), almost everything useful requires a paid plan mockflow.com
Sharing for review requires teammates to have a license, limited free-reviewer model vs Balsamiq / Figma capterra.com
Limited customization options and basic dropdown/input/modern control designs that lag contemporary UI conventions capterra.com
Outdated device templates and aging visual style for the wireframe canvas itself capterra.com
Customer support responsiveness is sometimes flagged as slow softwareadvice.com
AI credits are metered per plan tier, heavy users hit caps quickly on lower tiers mockflow.com
Some users consider per-seat pricing high relative to a narrow low-fi-only scope when Figma + FigJam covers both fidelities mockflow.com
Brand confusion with **mockflow.io** (an unrelated mock-API-generator product) sometimes muddies SEO and developer expectations mockflow.io
Losing greenfield mindshare to Figma + FigJam (which now covers low-fi and high-fi together) and to AI-native generators (v0, Lovable, Figma Make, Uizard) banani.co
Documentation outside English is limited (some Spanish, little else) support.mockflow.com
Build Mode (wireframe-to-code) produces stub-quality output that requires significant rework, not production-ready code mockflow.com