ProLaw API
No public REST API. ProLaw integration runs through Microsoft Office hooks and Thomson Reuters ecosystem partners; developer access is gated behind partnership agreements. There is no public documentation of any kind.
Frequently asked questions
ProLaw scores F on Supergood's API Report Card. No public REST API. ProLaw integration runs through Microsoft Office hooks and Thomson Reuters ecosystem partners; developer access is gated behind partnership agreements. There is no public documentation of any kind.
Without a usable official API, teams fall back on manual exports, file drops, or one-off vendor integrations. The other option is an unofficial API layer like Supergood that automates the authenticated web app directly. Site terms may apply to any integration approach, and how they apply is a determination each team makes for itself.
ProLaw is a comprehensive, server-based law practice management software suite by Elite (a division of Thomson Reuters). It combines practice management, document management, and accounting into a single integrated platform, primarily serving mid-size to large law firms with 10+ users.
Legal, Typically for mid-size to large law firms (10-200+ users) needing an all-in-one practice management, document management, and accounting suite, particularly litigation-focused firms. Centralized hub for matter management, time & expense tracking, billing, trust accounting, document management, conflict checking, and calendaring.
ProLaw holds approximately 21% market share in the legal practice management category (per 6sense data), with ~1,267 companies using it (per Enlyft). It's a well-known legacy player but has been losing ground to modern cloud-native competitors like Clio.
Yes, stores all matter/case data, client records, billing & time entries, trust accounting balances, documents, emails, and calendar/docket events. This is core operating data for law firms; losing access would halt firm operations.
~20+ years old, legacy server-based architecture. Recently added a simplified web interface (ProLaw Workspace) but core platform remains desktop/server-based. UI resembles older Microsoft Office. Feels dated compared to cloud-native competitors.
No public developer documentation or open API available. Integrations limited to Thomson Reuters ecosystem partners. Full sourced list under Sources below.
Common alternatives include Clio, Time Matters, MyCase, Filevine, Rocket Matter. Graded alternatives appear under "More from the report card" below.
Supergood's grades measure one thing: can a customer's engineering team get their own data out programmatically? Supergood checks six things (whether a real API exists, how access is gated, data coverage, auth quality, docs and developer experience, and stability) and rolls them into a letter grade. Supergood re-verifies grades, and they only move on evidence.
Yes, via a managed API layer. Supergood builds REST APIs and MCP servers for authenticated enterprise web apps, so AI agents and internal tools can read and write data programmatically. Site terms may apply to any integration approach, and how they apply is a determination each team makes for itself.
Not that we could find. As of August 2026 there is no official ProLaw MCP server in any public registry, and no maintained community server we're aware of. We re-verify this periodically — report an inaccuracy below if we missed one.
Not natively. ProLaw doesn't publish an MCP server, so MCP clients like Claude, Cursor, and Codex have nothing to connect to out of the box. If that changes, this page will reflect it.