IntakeQ publishes a real REST API with webhooks and hands any account owner a key in Settings. The catch is throughput: 10 requests a minute and 500 a day by default, with more capacity sold in-app and docs living in support articles.
IntakeQ scores B on Supergood's API Report Card. IntakeQ publishes a real REST API with webhooks and hands any account owner a key in Settings. The catch is throughput: 10 requests a minute and 500 a day by default, with more capacity sold in-app and docs living in support articles.
IntakeQ has a workable official integration path. Most engineering teams can build against it directly. Solid API with minor gaps
IntakeQ is a HIPAA-compliant SaaS platform for health and wellness practitioners that started as an electronic intake forms product and grew into a full practice management system sold under the PracticeQ name.
Healthcare, specifically small allied health and behavioral health practices: therapists, counselors, chiropractors, dietitians, physical therapists, naturopaths, and multi-practitioner clinics. A practice builds intake packages and consent forms, sends them automatically when a client books through the embedded widget, and receives completed forms into the client's timeline.
IntakeQ states it serves over 10,000 practitioners (https://linkedin.com/company/intakeq) and holds a 4.7 of 5 aggregate across 334 G2 and Capterra reviews (https://toolradar.com/tools/intakeq), which makes it a well-regarded but second-tier player next to SimplePractice and TherapyNotes in the small-practice EHR market.
Client demographics and contact details, insurance and policy data, intake questionnaire answers including medical history, treatment notes and diagnoses, appointment schedules, invoices, card payments, claims with payer and insured identifiers, uploaded files such as insurance cards, and practitioner rosters.
Founded in 2014; the web app is an AngularJS single-page portal (the HTML root carries ng-app="portalApp"), and the API uses Unix millisecond timestamps and PascalCase JSON fields, which dates its design.
A reviewer wishes there were an open API for billing because the built-in billing could not handle their complexity. Zapier reports IntakeQ has not built an official Zapier integration despite IntakeQ listing Zapier as a workflow option. Full sourced list under Sources below.
Common alternatives include SimplePractice, TherapyNotes, Healthie, Jane App, Practice Better. Graded alternatives appear under "More from the report card" below.
Supergood's grades measure one thing: can a customer's engineering team get their own data out programmatically? Supergood checks six things (whether a real API exists, how access is gated, data coverage, auth quality, docs and developer experience, and stability) and rolls them into a letter grade. Supergood re-verifies grades, and they only move on evidence.
Not that we could find. There is no official IntakeQ MCP server in any public registry, and no maintained community server we're aware of. We re-verify this periodically — report an inaccuracy below if we missed one.
Not natively. IntakeQ doesn't publish an MCP server, so MCP clients like Claude, Cursor, and Codex have nothing to connect to out of the box. If that changes, this page will reflect it.