The API Report CardAPI Index
Podium

Podium API

podium.com

Podium exposes a documented REST API (v4) at developer.podium.com covering conversations, contacts, reviews, payments, and webhooks, with OAuth 2.0 auth. Access is partner-gated: developer accounts take an application and multi-day review, and end customers get no direct path to their own data.

Last verified: October 2026Marketing & SalesNO MCP
API GRADE
F
VERIFIED OCT 2026

SCORECARD

ExistenceGOODDocumented public REST API (v4) at developer.podium.com covering messaging, reviews, payments, and webhooks.
AccessFAILDeveloper Portal access takes an application and multi-day review; end customers cannot pull their own data directly.
CoverageGOODEndpoints cover locations, conversations, contacts, reviews, payments, webhooks, and reporting; research names no gaps.
AuthGOODOAuth 2.0 with app credentials and per-object scopes; user-consented access tokens ride as JWTs on each request.
Docs & DXGOODPublic docs with a Postman workspace and an OpenAPI style reference; rate limits are not published.
StabilityMIXEDv3 and v4 coexist for older integrations, and webhook events drop from the queue after about 10 days with no replay API.
MCPNONENo official MCP server was found for Podium, and its developer documentation does not mention Model Context Protocol. GitHub matches are unrelated projects that happen to share the Podium name. VERIFIED 2026-08
MORE FROM THE REPORT CARD
Supergood turns hard-to-integrate enterprise software into clean REST APIs and MCP tools: stable endpoints, normalized JSON, managed auth.

Frequently asked questions

Podium scores F on Supergood's API Report Card. Podium exposes a documented REST API (v4) at developer.podium.com covering conversations, contacts, reviews, payments, and webhooks, with OAuth 2.0 auth. Access is partner-gated: developer accounts take an application and multi-day review, and end customers get no direct path to their own data.

Tried to integrate with Podium?
SOURCES
Developer Portal access requires application and multi-day review, API is not self-serve for individual customers, only for approved integration partners docs.podium.com ↗
Webhook events are dropped from the queue after ~10 days; if a partner's webhook endpoint is down longer than that, events are lost permanently with no replay API docs.podium.com ↗
Each webhook event type is bound to a specific OAuth scope, partners with under-scoped tokens silently miss events until they re-prompt customers for consent docs.podium.com ↗
Rate limits are not publicly documented in the developer portal, making capacity planning for high-volume partners difficult developer.podium.com ↗
API access is gated to partners, so end customers wanting to programmatically pull their own messages, reviews, or contacts cannot do so directly docs.podium.com ↗
Multiple API versions coexist (v3/v4 references in community documentation), forcing dual-version handling for older integrations apitracker.io ↗
No documented bulk export endpoint for full conversation history or review archives, partners must paginate every resource individually docs.podium.com ↗
OAuth scopes must follow least-privilege selection at app-creation time; adding scopes later requires reconfiguration and re-consent from end customers docs.podium.com ↗
BBB lists 11 complaints and 14 reviews in the past 36 months with a D- rating; Podium is not BBB-accredited bbb.org ↗
Multiple complaints of Podium continuing to charge ~$500/month for months after cancellation, with customer service unreachable to resolve bbb.org ↗
High and opaque pricing, often requiring negotiation; headline pricing is described as 'prohibitive' for smaller businesses crazyegg.com ↗
Annual contracts with notice-period cancellation requirements; users report cancellation taking multiple attempts and billing continuing after notice cardpaymentoptions.com ↗
Entry-tier bulk messaging capped at 250 messages/month with no rollover, frustrating businesses running monthly SMS campaigns business.org ↗
Support is routed through an AI chatbot first; reaching a human can take long waits, and users report repeating their story to multiple reps trustpilot.com ↗
Call routing reliability problems, one-way audio, missed inbound calls, mobile devices not ringing trustpilot.com ↗
No native Yelp integration despite Yelp being a major review platform for many home-services and restaurant verticals crazyegg.com ↗
CRM and other integrations are slower or harder to set up than advertised; some promised connectors require professional services g2.com ↗
AI Employee, Power Dialer-style features, and outbound calling are gated behind higher tiers, pushing real cost well above the entry plan businessnewsdaily.com ↗